Governing purpose

No judgment whatsoever. Christ.cx is a Judgment-Free Total Cognitive Freedom ecosystem. Think, question, believe, disbelieve, doubt, imagine, interpret, contradict, revise, remain silent, and collaborate without moral scoring, shame, condemnation, ranking, pressure to conform, or cognitive and ideological limitations.

Read the covenant

Passage research workspace

Scripture Explorer

Search and study eschatology passages by corpus, book, theme, language, and connected research records.

The explorer supplies concise, attributed excerpts only where licensing permits. It is a research map, not a substitute for consulting a complete critical edition or authorized translation.

Passage · context · language · history

Search 39 structured passage records

1 of 39 passages shown

Canonical passage records

Filtered passage map

Select records for a printable study sheet, or open a stable deep link to one passage.

New Testament · Matthew

Matthew 24:1–3

Temple and the disciples' questions

TEXT
Explicit

The discourse begins with the Jerusalem Temple, a prediction of its destruction, and a private set of questions on the Mount of Olives.

There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down. … Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?

King James Version (public domain)

Immediate context and meaning

The opening scene supplies the discourse's immediate subject: the Temple complex admired by the disciples will be dismantled. The questions then connect the announced destruction with the coming and the end of the age, but interpreters disagree over whether Matthew presents one compound question, several related questions, or a question whose assumptions the discourse later reshapes.

A responsible reading begins here rather than importing a prebuilt chart. Every later interpretation must explain why the discourse uses Judean geography, Temple language, generation language, and a universal coming horizon in the same literary unit.

Historical setting

  • Herodian rebuilding made the Second Temple complex one of the most imposing monumental spaces in the eastern Roman world.
  • Roman destruction in 70 CE provides an uncontested historical correlation with the prediction that the complex would be thrown down, while the theological scope of that fulfillment remains disputed.

Cross-references

Original-language notes

Interpretation summaries (3)

First-century horizon

Preterist and partial-preterist readings treat the Temple prediction as the controlling horizon for most of the discourse.

INTERPRETATION
Reasonable Interpretation

Prophetic telescoping

Eclectic and many futurist readings understand the Temple's destruction as a near event that opens onto a final coming and consummation.

INTERPRETATION
Disputed

Age-long pattern

Idealist and amillennial readings see the Temple judgment as an initial historical manifestation of recurring judgment and final consummation.

INTERPRETATION
Disputed

Explicit in the passage

  • The Temple complex will be thrown down.
  • The disciples ask about timing, a sign of the coming, and the completion of the age.
  • The conversation occurs privately on the Mount of Olives.

Not explicit in the passage

  • The passage does not yet specify a seven-year tribulation.
  • It does not say the questions refer to entirely separate events.
  • It does not say that every later sign begins only in the modern period.
Passage source coverage4 linked sources
  • Primary text1
  • Manuscript or critical text1
  • Ancient history1
  • Research provenance1

Coverage describes source types present; it is not a truth score or certainty percentage.

Passage citation notes (4)
  1. Locator: Matthew 24:1–3

    Primary source for the Matthew 24 passage navigator and text-only sequence. Relevant locator for this record: Matthew 24:1–3.

  2. Manuscript or critical textKing James Version

    Locator: Matthew 24:1–3

    Supplies short attributed excerpts used in the passage tools. Relevant locator for this record: Matthew 24:1–3.

  3. Ancient historyThe Jewish War

    Locator: Matthew 24:1–3

    Major narrative source for the Jewish War and the destruction of Jerusalem. Relevant locator for this record: Matthew 24:1–3.

  4. Locator: Matthew 24:1–3

    Detailed treatment of Daniel 9, AD 70, macro-models, and gathering timing. Relevant locator for this record: Matthew 24:1–3.

Passage sources (4)
Source coverage4 linked sources
  • Primary text1
  • Manuscript or critical text1
  • Ancient history1
  • Research provenance1

Coverage identifies source families present; it is not a truth score or certainty percentage.

Gospel according to Matthew

primary text

Coverage class: Primary text

Relevant text: Matthew 24–25

What it supports: Primary source for the Matthew 24 passage navigator and text-only sequence.

Limitations: Relationship to Mark, Luke, Daniel, and Revelation requires literary analysis.

Access and reuse: Source-specific terms apply

Consult the source or publisher before reproducing protected text, images, or apparatus content.

King James Version

public-domain translation

Coverage class: Manuscript or critical text

Author or issuer: Authorized Version

Publication date: 1611; public-domain edition

What it supports: Supplies short attributed excerpts used in the passage tools.

Limitations: Translation choices reflect early modern English and should be checked against the underlying languages.

Access and reuse: Source-specific terms apply

Consult the source or publisher before reproducing protected text, images, or apparatus content.

The Jewish War

ancient historical source

Coverage class: Ancient history

Author or issuer: Flavius Josephus

Relevant text: Books 4–7

Publication date: late first century CE

What it supports: Major narrative source for the Jewish War and the destruction of Jerusalem.

Limitations: Josephus writes with apologetic, political, and personal interests that require critical use.

Access and reuse: Source-specific terms apply

Consult the source or publisher before reproducing protected text, images, or apparatus content.

Great Tribulation Eschatology Research

research report

Coverage class: Research provenance

Report: CCX-RPT-44

What it supports: Detailed treatment of Daniel 9, AD 70, macro-models, and gathering timing.

Limitations: Some sources within the report vary in scholarly quality and require review.

Access and reuse: Source-specific terms apply

Consult the source or publisher before reproducing protected text, images, or apparatus content.

Integrated report provenance (2)

0 selected · maximum 12Selections are sent only through the page URL.

TEXTINTERPRETATION

Sequence must be demonstrated, not assumed

A passage's internal order is evidence. A cross-book chronology is an interpretation that must disclose which texts are being combined, where gaps or recapitulation are proposed, and which alternatives remain viable.

Corpus provenance

Research inputs

Authentic source titles are shown for provenance. Raw report files remain private, and inclusion does not verify every claim.

  • CCX-RPT-13The Great Tribulation: Biblical Origins and Interpretations
  • CCX-RPT-14The Abomination of Desolation — Daniel, Jesus, and Historical Fulfillments
  • CCX-RPT-15Signs in the Sun, Moon, Stars, and Heavens in Biblical Prophecy
  • CCX-RPT-42Islamic Eschatology, al-Masīḥ, and the End of the Age: A Comparative and Missiological Analysis
  • CCX-RPT-43Jewish Eschatology and Exegetical Traditions: A Comprehensive Analysis of Biblical and Interpretive Frameworks
  • CCX-RPT-48Interfaith UX Principles for Neutrality in Disputed Beliefs
Open the report index

Editorial review

Evidence and maintenance status

This page is maintained as a research guide. Review covers source attribution, evidence categories, competing interpretations, provenance, navigation, and print or mobile behavior.

Review scope: server-rendered fallback · canonical research records · source provenance · URL state · keyboard behavior · mobile layout · print output · empty states · claim-level citation notes · source-family coverage · quotation and metadata QA

Open correction history
Status
Editorial and source review complete
Last reviewed
Source trail
43 references or source records
Report provenance
6 linked research inputs
Evidence labels
TEXT, LANGUAGE, HISTORY, DISPUTED
Page model
data-backed