{
    "format": "christ.cx.enoch-transmission-network-export.v1",
    "generatedAtUtc": "2026-10-13T10:21:59+00:00",
    "boundary": {
        "title": "Working records, not a manufactured original",
        "summary": "Phase 26 is a source-informed evidence network and record workbench built from twelve private dossiers. Public records, relationships, and claims are explicitly provisional and remain outside the canonical research corpus until catalogue, language, custodial, and specialist review is completed.",
        "rules": [
            "A physical witness date is not a composition date.",
            "A translation is not an unmediated original.",
            "A critical reconstruction is not a physical artifact.",
            "Regional unavailability is not global loss.",
            "European acquisition is not the survival event of the text.",
            "Absence from one bounded corpus does not establish historical nonexistence.",
            "Quotation does not automatically establish canonical status.",
            "The Book of Giants remains a related but distinct work unless a claim is explicitly labeled and sourced.",
            "Modern technological and extraterrestrial readings belong to reception history, not ancient manuscript evidence.",
            "No numerical authenticity, trust, canon, or theological truth score is generated."
        ]
    },
    "filters": {
        "q": "BnF Éth. 49",
        "stage": "",
        "relation": "",
        "register": "",
        "unit": ""
    },
    "relationshipCount": 8,
    "stages": [
        {
            "id": "literary-composition",
            "label": "Literary composition proposals",
            "order": 1,
            "summary": "Scholarly proposals about when a literary unit took shape. These are not physical-manuscript dates.",
            "dateDimensions": [
                "composition-proposal"
            ],
            "registers": [
                "historical-reconstruction",
                "scholarly-interpretation"
            ],
            "boundary": "Composition proposals remain arguments and may be expressed as ranges or competing models."
        },
        {
            "id": "aramaic-witnesses",
            "label": "Aramaic physical witnesses",
            "order": 2,
            "summary": "Fragmentary manuscript evidence associated with several Enochic booklets and the Book of Giants.",
            "dateDimensions": [
                "physical-witness"
            ],
            "registers": [
                "physical-witness",
                "catalogue-fact"
            ],
            "boundary": "Fragments preserve only their surviving material; reconstruction must not be rendered as continuous original text."
        },
        {
            "id": "greek-mediation",
            "label": "Greek translation and copying layers",
            "order": 3,
            "summary": "Greek codices, papyri, and quotations represent active transmission and interpretation, not a transparent bridge.",
            "dateDimensions": [
                "translation",
                "physical-witness",
                "copying",
                "reception"
            ],
            "registers": [
                "physical-witness",
                "historical-reconstruction",
                "scholarly-interpretation"
            ],
            "boundary": "No single surviving Greek witness is treated as the unique direct source of the complete Geʽez anthology."
        },
        {
            "id": "geez-stewardship",
            "label": "Geʽez translation and living stewardship",
            "order": 4,
            "summary": "The substantially complete anthology survives through a long Geʽez manuscript and community tradition.",
            "dateDimensions": [
                "translation",
                "copying",
                "reception"
            ],
            "registers": [
                "physical-witness",
                "traditional-reading",
                "historical-reconstruction"
            ],
            "boundary": "Later surviving codices are not the date of initial translation, and European access is not the survival event."
        },
        {
            "id": "community-reception",
            "label": "Community reception and canon geography",
            "order": 5,
            "summary": "Quotation, authority, liturgical use, dispute, exclusion, preservation, and academic study vary by community and period.",
            "dateDimensions": [
                "reception"
            ],
            "registers": [
                "traditional-reading",
                "historical-reconstruction",
                "scholarly-interpretation"
            ],
            "boundary": "Quotation is not canon, and one region’s unavailability is not universal loss."
        },
        {
            "id": "acquisition-access",
            "label": "Acquisition, transfer, and new access",
            "order": 6,
            "summary": "Custody transfers and European access changed scholarly availability without creating or reviving the text itself.",
            "dateDimensions": [
                "acquisition",
                "publication"
            ],
            "registers": [
                "catalogue-fact",
                "historical-reconstruction"
            ],
            "boundary": "Acquisition language remains review-bound and must preserve community stewardship and power-context questions."
        },
        {
            "id": "critical-reconstruction",
            "label": "Critical edition and scholarly reconstruction",
            "order": 7,
            "summary": "Modern editors compare fragmentary witnesses, translations, and quotations to propose recoverable readings and corpus histories.",
            "dateDimensions": [
                "publication"
            ],
            "registers": [
                "scholarly-interpretation",
                "historical-reconstruction"
            ],
            "boundary": "A critical edition is an editorial model, not an ancient physical artifact or final uncontested text."
        },
        {
            "id": "modern-mutation",
            "label": "Modern reception and machine amplification",
            "order": 8,
            "summary": "Esoteric, extraterrestrial, technological, commercial, popular-media, and machine-generated readings belong to reception history.",
            "dateDimensions": [
                "reception",
                "publication",
                "digitization"
            ],
            "registers": [
                "modern-speculative-analogy",
                "popular-media",
                "commercial-framing",
                "machine-synthesis",
                "fiction"
            ],
            "boundary": "Modern analogy and repetition do not become ancient manuscript evidence through popularity or fluency."
        }
    ],
    "relationships": [
        {
            "id": "ENO-REL-026",
            "fromType": "corpus-unit",
            "fromId": "watchers",
            "toType": "witness",
            "toId": "ENO-WIT-010",
            "relation": "bounded-preservation",
            "label": "BnF Éth. 49 is associated with surviving or editorial evidence for watchers in the working dossier model.",
            "register": "physical-witness",
            "sourceDossiers": [
                "CCX-EMR-SRC-05",
                "CCX-EMR-SRC-06"
            ],
            "verificationState": "dossier-derived-working-relation",
            "directPhysicalJoin": false,
            "canonicalResearchEntity": false,
            "boundary": "This relation identifies bounded coverage only; it does not establish complete wording, direct ancestry, or an original anthology."
        },
        {
            "id": "ENO-REL-027",
            "fromType": "corpus-unit",
            "fromId": "parables",
            "toType": "witness",
            "toId": "ENO-WIT-010",
            "relation": "bounded-preservation",
            "label": "BnF Éth. 49 is associated with surviving or editorial evidence for parables in the working dossier model.",
            "register": "physical-witness",
            "sourceDossiers": [
                "CCX-EMR-SRC-05",
                "CCX-EMR-SRC-06"
            ],
            "verificationState": "dossier-derived-working-relation",
            "directPhysicalJoin": false,
            "canonicalResearchEntity": false,
            "boundary": "This relation identifies bounded coverage only; it does not establish complete wording, direct ancestry, or an original anthology."
        },
        {
            "id": "ENO-REL-028",
            "fromType": "corpus-unit",
            "fromId": "astronomical",
            "toType": "witness",
            "toId": "ENO-WIT-010",
            "relation": "bounded-preservation",
            "label": "BnF Éth. 49 is associated with surviving or editorial evidence for astronomical in the working dossier model.",
            "register": "physical-witness",
            "sourceDossiers": [
                "CCX-EMR-SRC-05",
                "CCX-EMR-SRC-06"
            ],
            "verificationState": "dossier-derived-working-relation",
            "directPhysicalJoin": false,
            "canonicalResearchEntity": false,
            "boundary": "This relation identifies bounded coverage only; it does not establish complete wording, direct ancestry, or an original anthology."
        },
        {
            "id": "ENO-REL-029",
            "fromType": "corpus-unit",
            "fromId": "dream-visions",
            "toType": "witness",
            "toId": "ENO-WIT-010",
            "relation": "bounded-preservation",
            "label": "BnF Éth. 49 is associated with surviving or editorial evidence for dream visions in the working dossier model.",
            "register": "physical-witness",
            "sourceDossiers": [
                "CCX-EMR-SRC-05",
                "CCX-EMR-SRC-06"
            ],
            "verificationState": "dossier-derived-working-relation",
            "directPhysicalJoin": false,
            "canonicalResearchEntity": false,
            "boundary": "This relation identifies bounded coverage only; it does not establish complete wording, direct ancestry, or an original anthology."
        },
        {
            "id": "ENO-REL-030",
            "fromType": "corpus-unit",
            "fromId": "epistle",
            "toType": "witness",
            "toId": "ENO-WIT-010",
            "relation": "bounded-preservation",
            "label": "BnF Éth. 49 is associated with surviving or editorial evidence for epistle in the working dossier model.",
            "register": "physical-witness",
            "sourceDossiers": [
                "CCX-EMR-SRC-05",
                "CCX-EMR-SRC-06"
            ],
            "verificationState": "dossier-derived-working-relation",
            "directPhysicalJoin": false,
            "canonicalResearchEntity": false,
            "boundary": "This relation identifies bounded coverage only; it does not establish complete wording, direct ancestry, or an original anthology."
        },
        {
            "id": "ENO-REL-031",
            "fromType": "corpus-unit",
            "fromId": "noachic",
            "toType": "witness",
            "toId": "ENO-WIT-010",
            "relation": "bounded-preservation",
            "label": "BnF Éth. 49 is associated with surviving or editorial evidence for noachic in the working dossier model.",
            "register": "physical-witness",
            "sourceDossiers": [
                "CCX-EMR-SRC-05",
                "CCX-EMR-SRC-06"
            ],
            "verificationState": "dossier-derived-working-relation",
            "directPhysicalJoin": false,
            "canonicalResearchEntity": false,
            "boundary": "This relation identifies bounded coverage only; it does not establish complete wording, direct ancestry, or an original anthology."
        },
        {
            "id": "ENO-REL-032",
            "fromType": "corpus-unit",
            "fromId": "chapter-108",
            "toType": "witness",
            "toId": "ENO-WIT-010",
            "relation": "bounded-preservation",
            "label": "BnF Éth. 49 is associated with surviving or editorial evidence for chapter 108 in the working dossier model.",
            "register": "physical-witness",
            "sourceDossiers": [
                "CCX-EMR-SRC-05",
                "CCX-EMR-SRC-06"
            ],
            "verificationState": "dossier-derived-working-relation",
            "directPhysicalJoin": false,
            "canonicalResearchEntity": false,
            "boundary": "This relation identifies bounded coverage only; it does not establish complete wording, direct ancestry, or an original anthology."
        },
        {
            "id": "ENO-REL-044",
            "fromType": "witness",
            "fromId": "ENO-WIT-008",
            "toType": "witness",
            "toId": "ENO-WIT-010",
            "relation": "reported-copy-or-commission-context",
            "label": "The dossiers connect MS Bruce 74 with a later presentation codex associated with European collection history.",
            "register": "historical-reconstruction",
            "sourceDossiers": [
                "CCX-EMR-SRC-05",
                "CCX-EMR-SRC-06"
            ],
            "verificationState": "dossier-derived-working-relation",
            "directPhysicalJoin": false,
            "canonicalResearchEntity": false,
            "boundary": "Commission, copying, custody, and alteration claims remain pending specialist and custodial-context review."
        }
    ]
}