# Review packet: Watchers and forbidden arts source audit

**Stable packet ID:** `ENO-RPK-002`  
**Packet snapshot:** `6d3a92de8c7332ab8b37b0ab8f26d5e2c2de6a4f180685fcece89831de645c2d`  
**Audit:** `ENO-AUD-002`  
**Passage:** `ENO-PAS-002`  
**Disposition:** Not reviewed

## Bounded question

The working evidence may support early Aramaic circulation of the Watchers narrative and later Greek and Geʽez transmission of the same broad episode.

## Stop line

The surviving layers do not establish extraterrestrial contact, genetic engineering, or a single untouched wording transmitted without scribal and translational mediation.

## Review disciplines

### Source verification

**Readiness:** Ready for review  
**Disposition:** Not reviewed  
**Why:** Object, provider, bibliography, and bounded source-exit identities are present for named verification.  
**Required return:** A named disposition identifying checked source exits, corrections, unresolved access limits, and the exact packet snapshot reviewed.

### Aramaic language

**Readiness:** Awaiting specialist  
**Disposition:** Not reviewed  
**Why:** Aramaic material or reconstruction is mapped, but no named Aramaic disposition has been imported.  
**Required return:** A named Aramaic disposition with passage-level corrections, explicitly bounded restorations, and cited edition or provider exits.

### Greek language

**Readiness:** Awaiting specialist  
**Disposition:** Not reviewed  
**Why:** Greek witness, translation, quotation, inference, or bounded absence is mapped without a named Greek disposition.  
**Required return:** A named Greek disposition identifying the witness or reception text, wording scope, translation limits, and unresolved recension questions.

### Geʽez language

**Readiness:** Awaiting specialist  
**Disposition:** Not reviewed  
**Why:** The Geʽez layer is mapped, but no named Geʽez language or manuscript-family disposition has been imported.  
**Required return:** A named Geʽez disposition with manuscript or edition scope, translation caveats, custodial context, and any required corrections.

### Textual criticism

**Readiness:** Awaiting specialist  
**Disposition:** Not reviewed  
**Why:** Cross-witness sequence, reconstruction, corpus-boundary, and absence claims remain working and unreviewed.  
**Required return:** A named textual-critical disposition accepting, revising, or rejecting each bounded conclusion and stop line without manufacturing an original.

### Reception and canon history

**Readiness:** Awaiting specialist  
**Disposition:** Not reviewed  
**Why:** Reception and authority relationships are mapped qualitatively, but no named reception or canon-history disposition exists.  
**Required return:** A named reception-history disposition identifying community, period, geography, relationship type, and limits on claims of canonization or suppression.

### Custodial and community context

**Readiness:** Awaiting community context  
**Disposition:** Not reviewed  
**Why:** Institutional and geographic context is present; named community or custodial-context review remains open where relevant.  
**Required return:** A named custodial or community-context disposition recording authority, terminology, correction needs, and any permission-dependent boundaries.

### Rights and reuse

**Readiness:** Awaiting rights decision  
**Disposition:** Not reviewed  
**Why:** Provider media or text exits exist, while local reproduction remains disabled pending a named rights decision.  
**Required return:** A named rights disposition for each proposed text or image use; absent permission must leave publication disabled.

### Accessibility and citation

**Readiness:** Ready for review  
**Disposition:** Not reviewed  
**Why:** The server-rendered packet, stable links, qualitative states, and exports are available for named accessibility and citation review.  
**Required return:** A named accessibility and citation disposition with corrections tied to stable element, source-exit, checkpoint, and packet identifiers.

## Review checklist

- [ ] **Scope and identity:** Are the passage, witness, audit, source, and packet identifiers correct and bounded to the material actually reviewed?
- [ ] **Evidence exits:** Do the attached exits perform the stated evidentiary jobs, and are provider, access, and rights states separated?
- [ ] **Support and stop line:** Does the working answer state only what the mapped evidence may support, with an explicit cannot-conclude boundary?
- [ ] **Language layer:** Are physical text, translation, reception, inference, and reconstruction distinguished for every language layer?
- [ ] **Reconstruction and absence:** Are restorations, joins, sequence proposals, and bounded absence represented without manufacturing continuity or nonexistence?
- [ ] **Reception and authority:** Are quotation, allusion, usefulness, authority, canon state, rejection, and modern mutation kept non-interchangeable?
- [ ] **Custody and community:** Does the wording avoid equating regional access with global survival and preserve community-specific authority and correction pathways?
- [ ] **Rights and publication:** Is direct text or image publication disabled unless edition scope, attribution, rights, and review are recorded?
- [ ] **Accessibility and export:** Can the packet be understood without color, JavaScript, hover, animation, or visual-only relationships, and do exports preserve boundaries?

## Evidence exits

- `ENO-EXT-001` — 4Q204 — 4Q Enoch manuscript record — https://www.deadseascrolls.org.il/explore-the-archive/manuscript/4Q204-1
- `ENO-EXT-003` — Leon Levy Dead Sea Scrolls Digital Library terms — https://www.deadseascrolls.org.il/terms
- `ENO-EXT-004` — Bodleian Library MS. Bruce 74 — https://digital.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/objects/637a8b9e-6ac5-4942-aa13-52a5266b65c7/
- `ENO-EXT-005` — Ethiopian and Eritrean Manuscripts collection — https://digital.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/collections/ethiopian-and-eritrean/
- `ENO-EXT-009` — R. H. Charles, The Book of Enoch (1912) — https://archive.org/details/cu31924067146773
- `ENO-EXT-010` — R. H. Charles, The Ethiopic Version of the Book of Enoch (1906) — https://archive.org/details/ethiopicversiono00charuoft
- `ENO-EXT-011` — Milik, The Books of Enoch (1976) — bibliographic record — https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/bulletin-of-the-school-of-oriental-and-african-studies/article/j-t-milik-ed-the-books-of-enoch-aramaic-fragments-of-qumran-cave-4-with-the-collaboration-of-matthew-black-xv-439-pp-32-plates-oxford-clarendon-press-1976-30/5B0C73B7138E0007ACD5ECCE3E2D8C92
- `ENO-EXT-012` — Discoveries in the Judaean Desert index — https://orion.huji.ac.il/resources/djd.shtml
- `ENO-EXT-013` — 4Q201 — 4Q Enoch manuscript record — https://www.deadseascrolls.org.il/explore-the-archive/manuscript/4Q201-1

## Return contract

- `packetId`
- `packetSnapshotDigest`
- `disciplineId`
- `reviewerName`
- `reviewerAffiliation`
- `reviewedAtUtc`
- `disposition`
- `acceptedBoundaries`
- `requestedCorrections`
- `citations`
- `notes`

> This packet is ready for assignment, not approved for publication. A disposition must bind the exact packet snapshot. Direct ancient text, critical text, and provider images remain disabled unless scope, attribution, rights, language review, and permission are separately recorded.