{ "format": "christ.cx.enoch-passage-export.v1", "generatedAtUtc": "2026-08-26T00:00:00Z", "boundary": { "title": "Working records, not a manufactured original", "summary": "Phase 26 is a source-informed evidence network and record workbench built from twelve private dossiers. Public records, relationships, and claims are explicitly provisional and remain outside the canonical research corpus until catalogue, language, custodial, and specialist review is completed.", "rules": [ "A physical witness date is not a composition date.", "A translation is not an unmediated original.", "A critical reconstruction is not a physical artifact.", "Regional unavailability is not global loss.", "European acquisition is not the survival event of the text.", "Absence from one bounded corpus does not establish historical nonexistence.", "Quotation does not automatically establish canonical status.", "The Book of Giants remains a related but distinct work unless a claim is explicitly labeled and sourced.", "Modern technological and extraterrestrial readings belong to reception history, not ancient manuscript evidence.", "No numerical authenticity, trust, canon, or theological truth score is generated." ] }, "passage": { "id": "ENO-PAS-008", "slug": "parables-son-of-man", "path": "/enoch/passages/parables-son-of-man", "reference": "1 Enoch 37–71", "title": "The Parables, the Son of Man, and bounded manuscript absence", "shortTitle": "Parables and Son of Man", "corpusUnit": "parables", "category": "corpus-boundary", "sequence": 8, "summary": "A passage-cluster dossier for the booklet that survives completely in Geʽez but has no identified Qumran Aramaic or surviving Greek witness in the current working corpus.", "whyItMatters": "The Parables are central to Enochic messianic and judgment traditions, yet their manuscript history is often simplified into either proof of a late forgery or proof of a pre-Christian complete anthology.", "boundedAnswer": "The working evidence may support complete Geʽez preservation of the Parables and bounded absence from the identified Qumran Enoch manuscripts and current Greek witness set.", "cannotConclude": "The absence does not prove historical nonexistence, a Christian forgery, a specific date, or a direct line of influence on every later Son of Man tradition.", "layers": [ { "id": "ENO-PAS-008-L1", "label": "Qumran Aramaic absence state", "group": "aramaic", "language": "Aramaic", "layerType": "bounded-absence", "state": "not-attested", "dateDimension": "physical-witness-date", "summary": "No identified Parables fragment appears among the working Qumran Enoch witness set.", "limitation": "This is an absence in a bounded surviving corpus, not proof that the booklet did not exist elsewhere.", "relatedWitnessIds": [], "relatedReceptionIds": [], "relatedClaimIds": [ "ENO-CLM-016", "ENO-CLM-025" ], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-03", "CCX-EMR-SRC-09" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-03", "CCX-EMR-09" ], "directTextIncluded": false, "verificationState": "dossier-derived-working-layer", "canonicalResearchEntity": false }, { "id": "ENO-PAS-008-L2", "label": "Greek absence state", "group": "greek", "language": "Greek", "layerType": "bounded-absence", "state": "not-attested", "dateDimension": "physical-witness-date", "summary": "The current working Greek witness inventory does not include a surviving physical Parables witness.", "limitation": "A missing surviving Greek manuscript does not establish that no Greek translation or intermediary ever existed.", "relatedWitnessIds": [], "relatedReceptionIds": [], "relatedClaimIds": [ "ENO-CLM-016", "ENO-CLM-025" ], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-04", "CCX-EMR-SRC-09" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-04", "CCX-EMR-09" ], "directTextIncluded": false, "verificationState": "dossier-derived-working-layer", "canonicalResearchEntity": false }, { "id": "ENO-PAS-008-L3", "label": "Geʽez complete layer", "group": "geez", "language": "Geʽez", "layerType": "translation-witness", "state": "translation-attested", "dateDimension": "physical-witness-date", "summary": "The Parables survive in the complete Geʽez anthology preserved by Tewahedo manuscript traditions.", "limitation": "The Geʽez form is a translation and does not expose an extant Semitic original or every intermediate stage.", "relatedWitnessIds": [ "ENO-WIT-008" ], "relatedReceptionIds": [], "relatedClaimIds": [ "ENO-CLM-008", "ENO-CLM-016", "ENO-CLM-026" ], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-05", "CCX-EMR-SRC-07", "CCX-EMR-SRC-09" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-05", "CCX-EMR-07", "CCX-EMR-09" ], "directTextIncluded": false, "verificationState": "dossier-derived-working-layer", "canonicalResearchEntity": false }, { "id": "ENO-PAS-008-L4", "label": "Dating and provenance debate", "group": "critical", "language": "Modern scholarship", "layerType": "critical-reconstruction", "state": "disputed", "dateDimension": "composition-date", "summary": "Scholars propose different dates, locations, and explanations for the Qumran absence and the booklet’s place in the anthology.", "limitation": "The current working dossier is not a named specialist disposition and must not be rendered as settled consensus.", "relatedWitnessIds": [ "ENO-WIT-012" ], "relatedReceptionIds": [], "relatedClaimIds": [ "ENO-CLM-014", "ENO-CLM-016", "ENO-CLM-027" ], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-03", "CCX-EMR-SRC-07", "CCX-EMR-SRC-09" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-03", "CCX-EMR-07", "CCX-EMR-09" ], "directTextIncluded": false, "verificationState": "dossier-derived-working-layer", "canonicalResearchEntity": false } ], "features": [ { "id": "ENO-PAS-008-F1", "label": "Bounded Qumran absence", "state": "bounded-absence", "statement": "The Parables are not identified in the surviving Qumran Enoch manuscripts represented here.", "evidence": "The corpus map and question workbench distinguish absence in one collection from universal nonexistence.", "limitation": "The interface must not render the absence as an absolute date or provenance verdict.", "affectedLayerIds": [ "ENO-PAS-008-L1" ], "relatedClaimIds": [ "ENO-CLM-025" ], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-03", "CCX-EMR-SRC-09" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-03", "CCX-EMR-09" ], "verificationState": "dossier-derived-working-feature", "canonicalResearchEntity": false }, { "id": "ENO-PAS-008-F2", "label": "No surviving Greek witness", "state": "bounded-absence", "statement": "The current Greek inventory does not supply a physical Parables witness.", "evidence": "The Greek-layer dossier records the known working witness set separately by corpus coverage.", "limitation": "This does not prove the absence of every lost Greek intermediary.", "affectedLayerIds": [ "ENO-PAS-008-L2" ], "relatedClaimIds": [ "ENO-CLM-025", "ENO-CLM-026" ], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-04", "CCX-EMR-SRC-09" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-04", "CCX-EMR-09" ], "verificationState": "dossier-derived-working-feature", "canonicalResearchEntity": false }, { "id": "ENO-PAS-008-F3", "label": "Son of Man terminology", "state": "divergent", "statement": "The Geʽez booklet contains several titles and formulations for the eschatological judge.", "evidence": "The Parables dossier identifies a complex title cluster rather than one simple English label.", "limitation": "Without an extant Semitic or Greek witness, retroversion and exact original wording remain interpretive.", "affectedLayerIds": [ "ENO-PAS-008-L3", "ENO-PAS-008-L4" ], "relatedClaimIds": [], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-09" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-09" ], "verificationState": "dossier-derived-working-feature", "canonicalResearchEntity": false }, { "id": "ENO-PAS-008-F4", "label": "Book of Giants replacement model", "state": "disputed", "statement": "One proposal treats the Parables as occupying a position earlier held by the Book of Giants in another collection form.", "evidence": "Qumran includes Giants material while the later Geʽez anthology contains the Parables.", "limitation": "The surviving evidence does not provide one complete physical anthology showing the replacement event.", "affectedLayerIds": [ "ENO-PAS-008-L1", "ENO-PAS-008-L3", "ENO-PAS-008-L4" ], "relatedClaimIds": [ "ENO-CLM-016", "ENO-CLM-022", "ENO-CLM-027" ], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-07", "CCX-EMR-SRC-08", "CCX-EMR-SRC-09" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-07", "CCX-EMR-08", "CCX-EMR-09" ], "verificationState": "dossier-derived-working-feature", "canonicalResearchEntity": false } ], "evidenceNeeds": [ "Independent dating and provenance review by Parables specialists.", "Geʽez language review of the title cluster.", "Explicit audit of every claim derived from Qumran and Greek absence." ], "relatedQuestionIds": [ "ENO-Q-003", "ENO-Q-004", "ENO-Q-005", "ENO-Q-006", "ENO-Q-011" ], "relatedWitnessIds": [ "ENO-WIT-008", "ENO-WIT-012" ], "relatedClaimIds": [ "ENO-CLM-008", "ENO-CLM-014", "ENO-CLM-016", "ENO-CLM-022", "ENO-CLM-025", "ENO-CLM-026", "ENO-CLM-027" ], "relatedReceptionIds": [], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-03", "CCX-EMR-SRC-04", "CCX-EMR-SRC-05", "CCX-EMR-SRC-07", "CCX-EMR-SRC-08", "CCX-EMR-SRC-09" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-03", "CCX-EMR-04", "CCX-EMR-05", "CCX-EMR-07", "CCX-EMR-08", "CCX-EMR-09" ], "verificationState": "dossier-derived-working-passage", "canonicalResearchEntity": false, "publicClaimsApproved": false }, "resolvedEvidence": { "witnesses": [ { "id": "ENO-WIT-008", "label": "MS Bruce 74", "shortLabel": "Bruce 74", "recordType": "codex", "register": "physical-witness", "language": "Geʽez", "material": "Parchment codex", "dateLabel": "16th century CE", "dateSort": 1550, "dateState": "Date and description reported in the supplied acquisition dossier", "dateDimension": "copying", "corpusUnits": [ "watchers", "parables", "astronomical", "dream-visions", "epistle", "noachic", "chapter-108" ], "findLocation": "Adwa acquisition context reported", "custody": "Bodleian Library reported; direct catalogue verification required", "custodyState": "community-use-to-institution", "extent": "Substantially complete Geʽez 1 Enoch within a multi-text codex", "significance": "The reports contrast its signs of indigenous use and multi-text format with later European-facing presentation copies.", "limitations": "Claims about liturgical use, acquisition terms, date, codicology, and antigraph relationships require direct manuscript-catalogue and specialist confirmation.", "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-01", "CCX-EMR-SRC-05", "CCX-EMR-SRC-06" ], "publicationState": "public-working-record", "canonicalResearchEntity": false, "verificationState": "dossier-derived; independent catalogue verification pending", "truthScore": null, "slug": "ms-bruce-74", "path": "/enoch/manuscripts/ms-bruce-74", "canSupport": "a Geʽez codex working record used to illustrate continuous Horn-of-Africa manuscript stewardship and a substantially complete anthology", "cannotEstablish": "the original text, a universally representative Tewahedo codex, or an independently verified custody narrative within this release", "transmissionStage": "geez-stewardship", "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-01", "CCX-EMR-05", "CCX-EMR-06" ], "relatedQuestionIds": [ "ENO-Q-001", "ENO-Q-003", "ENO-Q-007", "ENO-Q-010" ], "relatedPassageIds": [ "ENO-PAS-001", "ENO-PAS-002", "ENO-PAS-003", "ENO-PAS-004", "ENO-PAS-005", "ENO-PAS-006", "ENO-PAS-007", "ENO-PAS-008" ] }, { "id": "ENO-WIT-012", "label": "J. T. Milik, The Books of Enoch (1976)", "shortLabel": "Milik 1976", "recordType": "critical-edition", "register": "scholarly-interpretation", "language": "Modern critical edition", "material": "Printed scholarly reconstruction", "dateLabel": "1976 CE", "dateSort": 1976, "dateState": "Publication date", "dateDimension": "publication", "corpusUnits": [ "watchers", "astronomical", "dream-visions", "epistle", "giants" ], "findLocation": "Modern scholarly publication", "custody": "Published edition", "custodyState": "critical-reconstruction", "extent": "Edition, transcription, arrangement, and reconstruction of Aramaic fragments", "significance": "A foundational modern scholarly edition that reorganized the evidence and generated influential but contested theories.", "limitations": "A critical edition is not a physical witness. Reconstructions, joins, supplied text, and dating arguments must remain visibly editorial.", "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-01", "CCX-EMR-SRC-02", "CCX-EMR-SRC-03", "CCX-EMR-SRC-08", "CCX-EMR-SRC-09" ], "publicationState": "public-working-record", "canonicalResearchEntity": false, "verificationState": "dossier-derived; independent catalogue verification pending", "truthScore": null, "slug": "milik-books-of-enoch-1976", "path": "/enoch/manuscripts/milik-books-of-enoch-1976", "canSupport": "a modern critical-edition record that documents scholarly reconstruction and reclassification of fragmentary evidence", "cannotEstablish": "a physical ancient witness, a final uncontested reconstruction, or a replacement for the underlying manuscripts", "transmissionStage": "critical-reconstruction", "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-01", "CCX-EMR-02", "CCX-EMR-03", "CCX-EMR-08", "CCX-EMR-09" ], "relatedQuestionIds": [ "ENO-Q-001", "ENO-Q-011" ], "relatedPassageIds": [ "ENO-PAS-004", "ENO-PAS-006", "ENO-PAS-008", "ENO-PAS-009" ] } ], "claims": [ { "id": "ENO-CLM-008", "title": "Bounded record: MS Bruce 74", "statement": "The Phase 26 working dataset represents MS Bruce 74 as a Geʽez codex working record used to illustrate continuous Horn-of-Africa manuscript stewardship and a substantially complete anthology.", "register": "physical-witness", "status": "working-unreviewed", "dateDimension": "copying", "relatedWitnessIds": [ "ENO-WIT-008" ], "relatedCorpusUnits": [ "watchers", "parables", "astronomical", "dream-visions", "epistle", "noachic", "chapter-108" ], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-01", "CCX-EMR-SRC-05", "CCX-EMR-SRC-06" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-01", "CCX-EMR-05", "CCX-EMR-06" ], "supports": "a Geʽez codex working record used to illustrate continuous Horn-of-Africa manuscript stewardship and a substantially complete anthology", "doesNotEstablish": "the original text, a universally representative Tewahedo codex, or an independently verified custody narrative within this release", "verificationState": "dossier-derived; independent catalogue verification pending", "canonicalResearchEntity": false, "publicationState": "public-working-claim", "relatedQuestionIds": [ "ENO-Q-003", "ENO-Q-007" ], "relatedPassageIds": [ "ENO-PAS-001", "ENO-PAS-002", "ENO-PAS-003", "ENO-PAS-004", "ENO-PAS-005", "ENO-PAS-006", "ENO-PAS-007", "ENO-PAS-008" ] }, { "id": "ENO-CLM-014", "title": "Bounded record: J. T. Milik, The Books of Enoch (1976)", "statement": "The Phase 26 working dataset represents J. T. Milik, The Books of Enoch (1976) as a modern critical-edition record that documents scholarly reconstruction and reclassification of fragmentary evidence.", "register": "scholarly-interpretation", "status": "working-unreviewed", "dateDimension": "publication", "relatedWitnessIds": [ "ENO-WIT-012" ], "relatedCorpusUnits": [ "watchers", "astronomical", "dream-visions", "epistle", "giants" ], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-01", "CCX-EMR-SRC-02", "CCX-EMR-SRC-03", "CCX-EMR-SRC-08", "CCX-EMR-SRC-09" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-01", "CCX-EMR-02", "CCX-EMR-03", "CCX-EMR-08", "CCX-EMR-09" ], "supports": "a modern critical-edition record that documents scholarly reconstruction and reclassification of fragmentary evidence", "doesNotEstablish": "a physical ancient witness, a final uncontested reconstruction, or a replacement for the underlying manuscripts", "verificationState": "dossier-derived; independent catalogue verification pending", "canonicalResearchEntity": false, "publicationState": "public-working-claim", "relatedQuestionIds": [ "ENO-Q-011" ], "relatedPassageIds": [ "ENO-PAS-004", "ENO-PAS-006", "ENO-PAS-008", "ENO-PAS-009" ] }, { "id": "ENO-CLM-016", "title": "Corpus boundary: Book of Parables / Similitudes", "statement": "The working corpus map records Book of Parables / Similitudes with Aramaic state “not-found-in-bounded-corpus”, Greek state “materially-unattested”, Geʽez state “substantially-preserved”, and boundary state “booklet-with-disputed-date-and-provenance”.", "register": "scholarly-interpretation", "status": "working-unreviewed", "dateDimension": "composition-proposal", "relatedWitnessIds": [ "ENO-WIT-008", "ENO-WIT-009", "ENO-WIT-010" ], "relatedCorpusUnits": [ "parables" ], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-01", "CCX-EMR-SRC-05", "CCX-EMR-SRC-06" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-01", "CCX-EMR-05", "CCX-EMR-06" ], "supports": "Visions of judgment, the kings and the mighty, and the Chosen One / Son of Man complex.", "doesNotEstablish": "Absence from identified Qumran Enoch manuscripts does not establish nonexistence. Dating, provenance, and relationship to early Christianity remain scholarly questions.", "verificationState": "dossier-derived; corpus-boundary review pending", "canonicalResearchEntity": false, "publicationState": "public-working-claim", "relatedQuestionIds": [ "ENO-Q-002", "ENO-Q-003", "ENO-Q-004", "ENO-Q-005" ], "relatedPassageIds": [ "ENO-PAS-008" ] }, { "id": "ENO-CLM-022", "title": "Corpus boundary: Book of Giants", "statement": "The working corpus map records Book of Giants with Aramaic state “materially-attested”, Greek state “not-established-in-working-set”, Geʽez state “absent-from-standard-1-enoch”, and boundary state “related-distinct-work”.", "register": "scholarly-interpretation", "status": "working-unreviewed", "dateDimension": "composition-proposal", "relatedWitnessIds": [ "ENO-WIT-013", "ENO-WIT-014", "ENO-WIT-012" ], "relatedCorpusUnits": [ "giants" ], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-01", "CCX-EMR-SRC-02", "CCX-EMR-SRC-03", "CCX-EMR-SRC-08", "CCX-EMR-SRC-09" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-01", "CCX-EMR-02", "CCX-EMR-03", "CCX-EMR-08", "CCX-EMR-09" ], "supports": "Dreams, dialogue, violence, and impending judgment among the giant offspring of the Watchers.", "doesNotEstablish": "It must not be silently collapsed into standard 1 Enoch. Whether it occupied a place in an ancient anthology or circulated as a companion work remains disputed.", "verificationState": "dossier-derived; corpus-boundary review pending", "canonicalResearchEntity": false, "publicationState": "public-working-claim", "relatedQuestionIds": [ "ENO-Q-002", "ENO-Q-003", "ENO-Q-005" ], "relatedPassageIds": [ "ENO-PAS-008", "ENO-PAS-009" ] }, { "id": "ENO-CLM-025", "title": "Bounded absence is not nonexistence", "statement": "Failure to identify a work in one surviving corpus does not by itself establish that the work did not exist elsewhere or earlier.", "register": "scholarly-interpretation", "status": "durable-interface-rule", "dateDimension": "reception", "relatedWitnessIds": [], "relatedCorpusUnits": [], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-03", "CCX-EMR-SRC-09" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-03", "CCX-EMR-09" ], "supports": "A permanent data and interface boundary for separating evidence types.", "doesNotEstablish": "The historical truth of every dossier assertion to which the rule may be applied.", "verificationState": "interface rule adopted; underlying historical applications remain review-bound", "canonicalResearchEntity": false, "publicationState": "public-method-rule", "relatedQuestionIds": [ "ENO-Q-002", "ENO-Q-004" ], "relatedPassageIds": [ "ENO-PAS-008" ] }, { "id": "ENO-CLM-026", "title": "Translation is not an original", "statement": "A translated witness is mediated through language, copying, and recensional history and must not be presented as an unmediated original.", "register": "historical-reconstruction", "status": "durable-interface-rule", "dateDimension": "reception", "relatedWitnessIds": [], "relatedCorpusUnits": [], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-04", "CCX-EMR-SRC-07" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-04", "CCX-EMR-07" ], "supports": "A permanent data and interface boundary for separating evidence types.", "doesNotEstablish": "The historical truth of every dossier assertion to which the rule may be applied.", "verificationState": "interface rule adopted; underlying historical applications remain review-bound", "canonicalResearchEntity": false, "publicationState": "public-method-rule", "relatedQuestionIds": [ "ENO-Q-001", "ENO-Q-003", "ENO-Q-006", "ENO-Q-007" ], "relatedPassageIds": [ "ENO-PAS-001", "ENO-PAS-002", "ENO-PAS-003", "ENO-PAS-004", "ENO-PAS-005", "ENO-PAS-006", "ENO-PAS-007", "ENO-PAS-008" ] }, { "id": "ENO-CLM-027", "title": "Critical edition is not artifact", "statement": "A modern critical edition is an editorial reconstruction and must remain distinct from the physical manuscripts it edits.", "register": "scholarly-interpretation", "status": "durable-interface-rule", "dateDimension": "reception", "relatedWitnessIds": [], "relatedCorpusUnits": [], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-01", "CCX-EMR-SRC-02", "CCX-EMR-SRC-03" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-01", "CCX-EMR-02", "CCX-EMR-03" ], "supports": "A permanent data and interface boundary for separating evidence types.", "doesNotEstablish": "The historical truth of every dossier assertion to which the rule may be applied.", "verificationState": "interface rule adopted; underlying historical applications remain review-bound", "canonicalResearchEntity": false, "publicationState": "public-method-rule", "relatedQuestionIds": [ "ENO-Q-001", "ENO-Q-011" ], "relatedPassageIds": [ "ENO-PAS-002", "ENO-PAS-004", "ENO-PAS-005", "ENO-PAS-006", "ENO-PAS-008", "ENO-PAS-009" ] } ], "receptionRecords": [], "questions": [ { "id": "ENO-Q-003", "slug": "was-enoch-one-book", "path": "/enoch/questions/was-enoch-one-book", "title": "Was 1 Enoch one book from the beginning?", "shortTitle": "One book or anthology?", "domain": "corpus", "status": "open-dispute", "summary": "The surviving evidence is more compatible with a composite and fluid corpus than with one fixed book produced at a single moment.", "whyItMatters": "The modern title “1 Enoch” can make a collection of booklets appear to be a single original publication.", "boundedAnswer": "Several units have distinct literary histories and appear to have circulated independently before later anthology forms.", "cannotConclude": "The current working data cannot identify one final editor, date, place, or universally accepted ancient five-part arrangement.", "positions": [ { "id": "ENO-Q-003-P1", "label": "Fixed five-book collection from the start", "type": "contested-proposal", "statement": "The five-part structure was planned as a deliberate Enochic counterpart to the Pentateuch from the beginning.", "support": "Later five-part organization and some ancient anthological evidence can support intentional collection-making.", "limitation": "Independent scrolls, differing contents, and disputed unit boundaries prevent this from being treated as established.", "relatedClaimIds": [ "ENO-CLM-015", "ENO-CLM-016", "ENO-CLM-017", "ENO-CLM-018", "ENO-CLM-019" ], "relatedWitnessIds": [], "relatedCorpusUnits": [ "watchers", "parables", "astronomical", "dream-visions", "epistle" ], "relatedReceptionIds": [], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-07" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-07" ], "status": "working-unreviewed", "canonicalResearchEntity": false }, { "id": "ENO-Q-003-P2", "label": "Independent booklets later anthologized", "type": "bounded-conclusion", "statement": "Major Enochic literary units developed and circulated with significant independence before being combined.", "support": "Distinct witness patterns, literary seams, and separate corpus histories support a composite model.", "limitation": "The sequence and timing of every stage of anthology formation remain unresolved.", "relatedClaimIds": [ "ENO-CLM-015", "ENO-CLM-017", "ENO-CLM-018", "ENO-CLM-019" ], "relatedWitnessIds": [ "ENO-WIT-001", "ENO-WIT-003", "ENO-WIT-004" ], "relatedCorpusUnits": [ "watchers", "astronomical", "dream-visions", "epistle" ], "relatedReceptionIds": [], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-02", "CCX-EMR-SRC-07" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-02", "CCX-EMR-07" ], "status": "working-unreviewed", "canonicalResearchEntity": false }, { "id": "ENO-Q-003-P3", "label": "Multiple ancient collection forms", "type": "plausible-alternative", "statement": "More than one anthology or collection arrangement may have circulated in different communities and languages.", "support": "The relation of Book of Giants, Parables, Noachic materials, and later complete Geʽez form points to plural collection histories.", "limitation": "Specific ancient collection forms cannot be reconstructed as complete physical books from fragmentary evidence alone.", "relatedClaimIds": [ "ENO-CLM-016", "ENO-CLM-020", "ENO-CLM-022" ], "relatedWitnessIds": [], "relatedCorpusUnits": [ "parables", "noachic", "giants" ], "relatedReceptionIds": [], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-07", "CCX-EMR-SRC-08", "CCX-EMR-SRC-09" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-07", "CCX-EMR-08", "CCX-EMR-09" ], "status": "working-unreviewed", "canonicalResearchEntity": false }, { "id": "ENO-Q-003-P4", "label": "The Geʽez anthology is the original", "type": "unsupported-overreach", "statement": "The substantially complete Geʽez form directly preserves the original fixed anthology without significant mediation.", "support": "The Geʽez tradition preserves the only substantially complete surviving form.", "limitation": "Completeness of a later translation does not make it an unmediated original or erase earlier corpus variation.", "relatedClaimIds": [ "ENO-CLM-008", "ENO-CLM-026" ], "relatedWitnessIds": [ "ENO-WIT-008" ], "relatedCorpusUnits": [], "relatedReceptionIds": [], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-04", "CCX-EMR-SRC-05", "CCX-EMR-SRC-07" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-04", "CCX-EMR-05", "CCX-EMR-07" ], "status": "working-unreviewed", "canonicalResearchEntity": false } ], "evidenceNeeds": [ "Codicological review of anthological witnesses.", "Textual comparison of unit boundaries across languages.", "Explicit distinction between literary collection, physical codex, and modern critical table of contents." ], "dependencyQuestionIds": [ "ENO-Q-001", "ENO-Q-002", "ENO-Q-004", "ENO-Q-005", "ENO-Q-006" ], "relatedClaimIds": [ "ENO-CLM-015", "ENO-CLM-016", "ENO-CLM-017", "ENO-CLM-018", "ENO-CLM-019", "ENO-CLM-020", "ENO-CLM-022" ], "relatedWitnessIds": [ "ENO-WIT-001", "ENO-WIT-002", "ENO-WIT-003", "ENO-WIT-004", "ENO-WIT-008", "ENO-WIT-013", "ENO-WIT-014" ], "relatedCorpusUnits": [ "watchers", "parables", "astronomical", "dream-visions", "epistle", "noachic", "chapter-108", "giants" ], "relatedReceptionIds": [], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-02", "CCX-EMR-SRC-07", "CCX-EMR-SRC-08", "CCX-EMR-SRC-09" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-02", "CCX-EMR-07", "CCX-EMR-08", "CCX-EMR-09" ], "verificationState": "dossier-derived-working-question", "canonicalResearchEntity": false, "publicClaimsApproved": false, "relatedPassageIds": [ "ENO-PAS-004", "ENO-PAS-005", "ENO-PAS-006", "ENO-PAS-007", "ENO-PAS-008", "ENO-PAS-009" ] }, { "id": "ENO-Q-004", "slug": "what-does-parables-absence-establish", "path": "/enoch/questions/what-does-parables-absence-establish", "title": "What does the absence of the Parables at Qumran establish?", "shortTitle": "The missing Parables", "domain": "absence", "status": "open-dispute", "summary": "The bounded fact is that no identified Parables witness appears in the currently mapped Qumran Enoch corpus. Explanations for that absence remain disputed.", "whyItMatters": "Absence can be informative, but interfaces often convert “not found here” into “did not exist anywhere.”", "boundedAnswer": "The Qumran corpus currently mapped by the project does not contain an identified physical witness to the Parables.", "cannotConclude": "This absence alone cannot prove a late date, Christian authorship, historical nonexistence, or the reason the Qumran collection lacks the work.", "positions": [ { "id": "ENO-Q-004-P1", "label": "Bounded corpus absence", "type": "bounded-conclusion", "statement": "No identified Parables fragment appears among the mapped Qumran Enoch witnesses.", "support": "The current corpus and witness map record the absence explicitly.", "limitation": "The statement is restricted to the examined corpus and current identification state.", "relatedClaimIds": [ "ENO-CLM-016", "ENO-CLM-025" ], "relatedWitnessIds": [], "relatedCorpusUnits": [ "parables" ], "relatedReceptionIds": [], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-03", "CCX-EMR-SRC-07", "CCX-EMR-SRC-09" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-03", "CCX-EMR-07", "CCX-EMR-09" ], "status": "working-unreviewed", "canonicalResearchEntity": false }, { "id": "ENO-Q-004-P2", "label": "The work did not yet exist", "type": "contested-proposal", "statement": "The absence indicates that the Parables were composed later than the Qumran library.", "support": "A late composition would explain the lack of physical witnesses there.", "limitation": "The library is not an exhaustive archive, and absence does not establish nonexistence.", "relatedClaimIds": [ "ENO-CLM-016", "ENO-CLM-025" ], "relatedWitnessIds": [], "relatedCorpusUnits": [ "parables" ], "relatedReceptionIds": [], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-09" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-09" ], "status": "working-unreviewed", "canonicalResearchEntity": false }, { "id": "ENO-Q-004-P3", "label": "Sectarian or geographic non-adoption", "type": "plausible-alternative", "statement": "The work may have existed but circulated outside the community or regions represented by the Qumran library.", "support": "Community selection, geography, and distinct Enochic networks can account for bounded absence.", "limitation": "The specific community or geography of composition and circulation is not established by absence alone.", "relatedClaimIds": [], "relatedWitnessIds": [], "relatedCorpusUnits": [ "parables" ], "relatedReceptionIds": [], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-09", "CCX-EMR-SRC-11" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-09", "CCX-EMR-11" ], "status": "working-unreviewed", "canonicalResearchEntity": false }, { "id": "ENO-Q-004-P4", "label": "Christian interpolation", "type": "contested-proposal", "statement": "The Parables are a later Christian composition added to the collection.", "support": "The developed Son of Man language and Qumran absence have been used to support this proposal.", "limitation": "The proposal must account for the text’s Jewish features and cannot be treated as settled in this unreviewed dossier layer.", "relatedClaimIds": [], "relatedWitnessIds": [], "relatedCorpusUnits": [ "parables" ], "relatedReceptionIds": [], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-09" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-09" ], "status": "working-unreviewed", "canonicalResearchEntity": false } ], "evidenceNeeds": [ "Specialist review of the complete manuscript and citation record.", "Position matrix tied to named scholars and primary editions.", "Explicit separation of absence evidence from dating arguments." ], "dependencyQuestionIds": [ "ENO-Q-002", "ENO-Q-003", "ENO-Q-005", "ENO-Q-009" ], "relatedClaimIds": [ "ENO-CLM-016", "ENO-CLM-025" ], "relatedWitnessIds": [], "relatedCorpusUnits": [ "parables" ], "relatedReceptionIds": [ "ENO-REC-011" ], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-03", "CCX-EMR-SRC-07", "CCX-EMR-SRC-09" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-03", "CCX-EMR-07", "CCX-EMR-09" ], "verificationState": "dossier-derived-working-question", "canonicalResearchEntity": false, "publicClaimsApproved": false, "relatedPassageIds": [ "ENO-PAS-008" ] }, { "id": "ENO-Q-005", "slug": "how-does-book-of-giants-relate", "path": "/enoch/questions/how-does-book-of-giants-relate", "title": "How does the Book of Giants relate to 1 Enoch?", "shortTitle": "Book of Giants boundary", "domain": "corpus", "status": "open-dispute", "summary": "The safest public classification is “related distinct Enochic work.” Stronger claims about anthology position or replacement remain proposals.", "whyItMatters": "The work shares Watcher traditions and manuscript proximity with Enochic materials, but relation does not automatically establish inclusion.", "boundedAnswer": "The Book of Giants is materially attested as an ancient related work with its own narrative and transmission history.", "cannotConclude": "The current evidence does not establish that it was a standard chapter of every Enochic anthology or that the Parables universally replaced it.", "positions": [ { "id": "ENO-Q-005-P1", "label": "Related distinct work", "type": "bounded-conclusion", "statement": "The Book of Giants belongs to the wider Enochic literary environment while remaining a distinct work in the public data model.", "support": "Its stable corpus unit, witnesses, and relation type preserve both affinity and difference.", "limitation": "This label does not settle every ancient collection boundary.", "relatedClaimIds": [ "ENO-CLM-012", "ENO-CLM-013", "ENO-CLM-022" ], "relatedWitnessIds": [ "ENO-WIT-013", "ENO-WIT-014" ], "relatedCorpusUnits": [ "giants" ], "relatedReceptionIds": [], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-08" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-08" ], "status": "working-unreviewed", "canonicalResearchEntity": false }, { "id": "ENO-Q-005-P2", "label": "Ancient anthology member later displaced", "type": "contested-proposal", "statement": "The work once occupied a formal place in an Enochic collection and was later replaced by the Parables.", "support": "Manuscript proximity and contrasting collection contents can motivate this reconstruction.", "limitation": "No complete physical anthology survives that directly demonstrates a universal replacement event.", "relatedClaimIds": [ "ENO-CLM-016", "ENO-CLM-022" ], "relatedWitnessIds": [ "ENO-WIT-013", "ENO-WIT-014" ], "relatedCorpusUnits": [ "giants", "parables" ], "relatedReceptionIds": [], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-07", "CCX-EMR-SRC-08", "CCX-EMR-SRC-09" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-07", "CCX-EMR-08", "CCX-EMR-09" ], "status": "working-unreviewed", "canonicalResearchEntity": false }, { "id": "ENO-Q-005-P3", "label": "Independent companion apocalypse", "type": "plausible-alternative", "statement": "The work circulated independently alongside Watcher traditions and was selected by some communities without being part of a fixed pentateuch.", "support": "Narrative independence and distinct later Manichaean transmission are compatible with companion circulation.", "limitation": "Independence cannot be proved for every stage or community.", "relatedClaimIds": [], "relatedWitnessIds": [], "relatedCorpusUnits": [ "giants", "watchers" ], "relatedReceptionIds": [], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-08" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-08" ], "status": "working-unreviewed", "canonicalResearchEntity": false }, { "id": "ENO-Q-005-P4", "label": "Standard second book of 1 Enoch", "type": "unsupported-overreach", "statement": "The Book of Giants should be presented as the original standard second book of 1 Enoch.", "support": "One reconstruction places it in an Enochic five-part architecture.", "limitation": "A debated corpus model cannot be rendered as an uncontested table of contents.", "relatedClaimIds": [], "relatedWitnessIds": [], "relatedCorpusUnits": [ "giants" ], "relatedReceptionIds": [], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-08" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-08" ], "status": "working-unreviewed", "canonicalResearchEntity": false } ], "evidenceNeeds": [ "Aramaic specialist review of witness identification and joins.", "Corpus-boundary review distinguishing physical proximity from anthology membership.", "Manichaean-language review for later adaptation claims." ], "dependencyQuestionIds": [ "ENO-Q-002", "ENO-Q-003", "ENO-Q-004" ], "relatedClaimIds": [ "ENO-CLM-012", "ENO-CLM-013", "ENO-CLM-022" ], "relatedWitnessIds": [ "ENO-WIT-013", "ENO-WIT-014" ], "relatedCorpusUnits": [ "giants", "watchers", "parables" ], "relatedReceptionIds": [], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-07", "CCX-EMR-SRC-08", "CCX-EMR-SRC-09" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-07", "CCX-EMR-08", "CCX-EMR-09" ], "verificationState": "dossier-derived-working-question", "canonicalResearchEntity": false, "publicClaimsApproved": false, "relatedPassageIds": [ "ENO-PAS-008", "ENO-PAS-009" ] }, { "id": "ENO-Q-006", "slug": "what-is-the-greek-layer", "path": "/enoch/questions/what-is-the-greek-layer", "title": "What role does the Greek layer play?", "shortTitle": "The Greek layer", "domain": "translation", "status": "bounded-answer-with-open-issues", "summary": "The Greek evidence should be represented as an active translation and copying layer, not as an invisible conduit or a single recovered master text.", "whyItMatters": "Public summaries often jump directly from Aramaic originals to the complete Geʽez form, erasing centuries of Greek mediation.", "boundedAnswer": "Greek witnesses and quotations preserve distinct parts and readings that help explain translation history and later Geʽez forms.", "cannotConclude": "No surviving Greek witness can be treated as the complete, singular Vorlage of the whole Geʽez anthology.", "positions": [ { "id": "ENO-Q-006-P1", "label": "Transparent bridge", "type": "unsupported-overreach", "statement": "Greek merely carried unchanged Aramaic wording into Geʽez.", "support": "A broad Aramaic-to-Greek-to-Geʽez chain is often proposed.", "limitation": "Translation, recensional variation, scribal changes, and fragmentary survival make transparency an unsafe assumption.", "relatedClaimIds": [ "ENO-CLM-005", "ENO-CLM-006", "ENO-CLM-007", "ENO-CLM-026" ], "relatedWitnessIds": [ "ENO-WIT-005", "ENO-WIT-006", "ENO-WIT-007" ], "relatedCorpusUnits": [], "relatedReceptionIds": [], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-04" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-04" ], "status": "working-unreviewed", "canonicalResearchEntity": false }, { "id": "ENO-Q-006-P2", "label": "Active translation and copying layer", "type": "bounded-conclusion", "statement": "Greek witnesses represent their own textual, linguistic, and reception history between earlier Semitic materials and later translations.", "support": "Different physical witnesses and quotations preserve divergent readings and corpus portions.", "limitation": "The precise relationship among all Greek recensions remains a specialist question.", "relatedClaimIds": [ "ENO-CLM-005", "ENO-CLM-006", "ENO-CLM-007", "ENO-CLM-026" ], "relatedWitnessIds": [ "ENO-WIT-005", "ENO-WIT-006", "ENO-WIT-007" ], "relatedCorpusUnits": [], "relatedReceptionIds": [ "ENO-REC-007", "ENO-REC-010" ], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-04" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-04" ], "status": "working-unreviewed", "canonicalResearchEntity": false }, { "id": "ENO-Q-006-P3", "label": "One Greek translation explains all evidence", "type": "contested-proposal", "statement": "A single Greek translation or recension underlies the complete Geʽez text.", "support": "Shared Greek features in Geʽez can point to Greek mediation.", "limitation": "Divergent Greek witnesses and section-specific histories make a single uniform source difficult to establish.", "relatedClaimIds": [ "ENO-CLM-026" ], "relatedWitnessIds": [ "ENO-WIT-005", "ENO-WIT-006", "ENO-WIT-007" ], "relatedCorpusUnits": [], "relatedReceptionIds": [], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-04" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-04" ], "status": "working-unreviewed", "canonicalResearchEntity": false }, { "id": "ENO-Q-006-P4", "label": "Multiple Greek recensions or section histories", "type": "plausible-alternative", "statement": "Different booklets may have passed through different Greek forms or translation histories before the Geʽez anthology.", "support": "Section-specific vocabulary and divergent physical witnesses are compatible with plural mediation.", "limitation": "The number, geography, and direct relationships of those recensions remain uncertain.", "relatedClaimIds": [], "relatedWitnessIds": [], "relatedCorpusUnits": [ "watchers", "parables", "astronomical", "dream-visions", "epistle" ], "relatedReceptionIds": [], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-04", "CCX-EMR-SRC-07" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-04", "CCX-EMR-07" ], "status": "working-unreviewed", "canonicalResearchEntity": false } ], "evidenceNeeds": [ "Greek philological review of each witness and quotation.", "Passage-level comparison with stated lacunae and recensional uncertainty.", "No claim of direct descent without a bounded physical or textual argument." ], "dependencyQuestionIds": [ "ENO-Q-001", "ENO-Q-003", "ENO-Q-007", "ENO-Q-011" ], "relatedClaimIds": [ "ENO-CLM-005", "ENO-CLM-006", "ENO-CLM-007", "ENO-CLM-026" ], "relatedWitnessIds": [ "ENO-WIT-005", "ENO-WIT-006", "ENO-WIT-007" ], "relatedCorpusUnits": [ "watchers", "dream-visions", "epistle" ], "relatedReceptionIds": [ "ENO-REC-007", "ENO-REC-010" ], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-04", "CCX-EMR-SRC-07" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-04", "CCX-EMR-07" ], "verificationState": "dossier-derived-working-question", "canonicalResearchEntity": false, "publicClaimsApproved": false, "relatedPassageIds": [ "ENO-PAS-001", "ENO-PAS-002", "ENO-PAS-003", "ENO-PAS-004", "ENO-PAS-005", "ENO-PAS-007", "ENO-PAS-008" ] }, { "id": "ENO-Q-011", "slug": "what-is-a-critical-edition", "path": "/enoch/questions/what-is-a-critical-edition", "title": "What is a critical edition—and what is it not?", "shortTitle": "Critical edition boundary", "domain": "editorial-method", "status": "methodological-rule", "summary": "A critical edition is a modern scholarly representation built from selected witnesses, readings, reconstructions, and editorial decisions.", "whyItMatters": "Readers often encounter a clean printed text without seeing the fragments, supplied letters, alternate readings, or editorial apparatus behind it.", "boundedAnswer": "A critical edition can organize evidence, disclose variants, and propose recoverable wording or corpus structure.", "cannotConclude": "It is not an ancient physical artifact, a direct photograph of an original, or a final uncontested text.", "positions": [ { "id": "ENO-Q-011-P1", "label": "Ancient artifact in modern print", "type": "unsupported-overreach", "statement": "A published critical text simply reproduces the ancient original.", "support": "Editors work from ancient witnesses and may recover plausible readings.", "limitation": "Selection, reconstruction, normalization, and supplied text remain modern editorial acts.", "relatedClaimIds": [ "ENO-CLM-014", "ENO-CLM-027" ], "relatedWitnessIds": [ "ENO-WIT-012" ], "relatedCorpusUnits": [], "relatedReceptionIds": [], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-01", "CCX-EMR-SRC-03", "CCX-EMR-SRC-07" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-01", "CCX-EMR-03", "CCX-EMR-07" ], "status": "working-unreviewed", "canonicalResearchEntity": false }, { "id": "ENO-Q-011-P2", "label": "Transparent editorial model", "type": "bounded-conclusion", "statement": "A critical edition should expose its witness base, supplied readings, apparatus, and unresolved alternatives.", "support": "The Evidence Ledger and witness records can separate artifact, reconstruction, and publication.", "limitation": "Transparency does not make every reconstruction correct or eliminate specialist disagreement.", "relatedClaimIds": [ "ENO-CLM-014", "ENO-CLM-027" ], "relatedWitnessIds": [ "ENO-WIT-012" ], "relatedCorpusUnits": [], "relatedReceptionIds": [ "ENO-REC-012" ], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-01", "CCX-EMR-SRC-03", "CCX-EMR-SRC-07" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-01", "CCX-EMR-03", "CCX-EMR-07" ], "status": "working-unreviewed", "canonicalResearchEntity": false }, { "id": "ENO-Q-011-P3", "label": "Final original text", "type": "unsupported-overreach", "statement": "Once a major edition is published, it settles the original wording and corpus order.", "support": "Critical editions may become field-defining reference points.", "limitation": "New fragments, images, readings, joins, and methodological critiques can revise an edition.", "relatedClaimIds": [ "ENO-CLM-014", "ENO-CLM-027" ], "relatedWitnessIds": [ "ENO-WIT-012" ], "relatedCorpusUnits": [], "relatedReceptionIds": [], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-03" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-03" ], "status": "working-unreviewed", "canonicalResearchEntity": false }, { "id": "ENO-Q-011-P4", "label": "One scholarly position among several", "type": "plausible-alternative", "statement": "An edition may embed a specific theory of dates, joins, sequence, and corpus boundaries that should be compared with alternatives.", "support": "The working Milik record is explicitly classified as a critical-edition and reclassification object.", "limitation": "The current public data does not reproduce a full apparatus or adjudicate named specialists.", "relatedClaimIds": [ "ENO-CLM-014" ], "relatedWitnessIds": [ "ENO-WIT-012" ], "relatedCorpusUnits": [], "relatedReceptionIds": [ "ENO-REC-012" ], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-03", "CCX-EMR-SRC-07", "CCX-EMR-SRC-09" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-03", "CCX-EMR-07", "CCX-EMR-09" ], "status": "working-unreviewed", "canonicalResearchEntity": false } ], "evidenceNeeds": [ "Edition-level review of apparatus and reconstruction conventions.", "Passage-level display of supplied text, alternatives, and physical gaps.", "Named review of joins and retroversion methods." ], "dependencyQuestionIds": [ "ENO-Q-001", "ENO-Q-002", "ENO-Q-003", "ENO-Q-006" ], "relatedClaimIds": [ "ENO-CLM-014", "ENO-CLM-027" ], "relatedWitnessIds": [ "ENO-WIT-012" ], "relatedCorpusUnits": [], "relatedReceptionIds": [ "ENO-REC-012" ], "sourceDossiers": [ "CCX-EMR-SRC-01", "CCX-EMR-SRC-03", "CCX-EMR-SRC-07", "CCX-EMR-SRC-09" ], "reviewPacketIds": [ "CCX-EMR-01", "CCX-EMR-03", "CCX-EMR-07", "CCX-EMR-09" ], "verificationState": "dossier-derived-working-question", "canonicalResearchEntity": false, "publicClaimsApproved": false, "relatedPassageIds": [ "ENO-PAS-004", "ENO-PAS-005", "ENO-PAS-006", "ENO-PAS-008", "ENO-PAS-009" ] } ], "corpusUnit": { "id": "parables", "label": "Book of Parables / Similitudes", "chapters": "37–71", "standardPosition": 2, "summary": "Visions of judgment, the kings and the mighty, and the Chosen One / Son of Man complex.", "aramaicState": "not-found-in-bounded-corpus", "greekState": "materially-unattested", "geezState": "substantially-preserved", "boundaryState": "booklet-with-disputed-date-and-provenance", "independentCirculation": "Not established by the physical records in this Phase 25 working set.", "witnessIds": [ "ENO-WIT-008", "ENO-WIT-009", "ENO-WIT-010" ], "limitations": "Absence from identified Qumran Enoch manuscripts does not establish nonexistence. Dating, provenance, and relationship to early Christianity remain scholarly questions.", "relatedQuestionIds": [ "ENO-Q-002", "ENO-Q-003", "ENO-Q-004", "ENO-Q-005", "ENO-Q-006" ], "relatedPassageIds": [ "ENO-PAS-008" ] } } }